Ottawa Didn’t Disclose China’s Spy Balloon Because There Were ‘Lives at Stake,’ Minister Says

Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino rises during Question Period, Monday, January 30, 2023 in Ottawa. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld

Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino says Ottawa didn’t tell the public about China’s spy balloon that was spotted over North America because there were “lives at stake.”

“There are lives at stake. There are techniques at stake. This is complex stuff,” Mendicino told the Canada-China House of Commons committee on Feb. 6.

Mendicino was being challenged by Conservative public safety critic Raquel Dancho on why the Canadian public didn’t learn about the balloon from the federal government, raising concerns about transparency.

“Canadians actually found out about the spy balloon that was over Canadian sovereignty for several days not from your government, not from a Canadian news agency, but from an American one. Do you find that acceptable?” Dancho said.

Mendicino said the government needs to be cautious about releasing information so it doesn’t jeopardize any national security operation, “as well as the people who are engaged in those operations.”

“That is a matter of the utmost sensitivity,” he said.

Dancho retorted that the U.S. government would have the same consideration, but it still shared the information.

Mendicino’s reply centred around Canada and the United States collaborating in response to the incident.

Dancho asked Mendicino to confirm his comments that there were “lives at stake” if the government informed the public about the spy balloon.

“We have people who are in the field at work in a wide range of agencies, including in the Canadian military, and yes, everyday they put their lives at stake to protect our national interest,” Mendicino said, as Dancho’s allotted time for questioning the minister ran out.

News reports about the high-altitude surveillance balloon, which had travelled over sensitive military sites across North America, first appeared on Feb. 2. Authorities said that they first discovered the object on Jan. 28 over the Aleutian Islands of Alaska.

The balloon was shot down by U.S. military jets off the coast of South Carolina on Feb. 4. U.S. officials said they waited until the object was above water to destroy it, to avoid any potential damage or injuries from debris.

The Republicans in the United States and the Conservatives in Canada have asked why the North American Aerospace Defence Command (NORAD), which is jointly operated by the United States and Canada, didn’t take action earlier. Republicans have argued that it could have been destroyed earlier while taking caution that the operation didn’t endanger anyone’s safety.

American Air Force Gen. Glen VanHerck, who serves as the commander of NORAD, said on Feb. 6 that their assessment was that the object didn’t present a “physical military threat” to North America.

VanHerck added that authorities exercised “maximum precaution to prevent any intelligence collection” by the balloon as it was allowed to remain in North American airspace, while they worked to gather more intelligence about China’s capabilities.

He also said that the U.S. military failed to detect previous incursions into U.S. airspace by Chinese spy balloons in prior years.

“I will tell you that we did not detect those threats, and that’s a domain awareness gap,” he told reporters.

Canadian Airspace
During the committee hearing, Mendicino was asked for confirmation as to whether the balloon had travelled in Canadian airspace.

“What I would say to you and to the members of this committee is that we are always vigilant around potential threats to our airspace, to our sovereignty, and to our national security,” the minister said.

“That’s a non-answer,” Dancho said.

A Feb. 4 statement by Defence Minister Anita Anand said that the balloon had “violated U.S. and Canadian airspace and international law.”

“Officials in the national security community have been working bi-nationally and Canada has been closely engaged with its U.S. counterparts on the decision and unequivocally supports the actions taken,” Anand said, referring to the U.S. military taking down the balloon.

source: the epoch times